The Seduction of ROAS

By David L. Miller

Seduction is a potent force. It lures us in with promises of ease, of certainty, of a clear-cut path to success. And in the cutthroat world of digital marketing, few things are more seductive than Return on Ad Spend (ROAS). This tantalizing metric holds out the promise of hard numbers, of quantifiable ROI, of a seemingly foolproof way to optimize our advertising budgets and supercharge our returns.

But like any siren’s call, the pull of ROAS comes with a warning: its promise of immediate gratification threatens to distract us from the profit-driving strategies that build brands, forge connections, and generate conversions. Instead, we’re trapped by the seductive pitfalls that often accompany this enticing metric:

  • Inaccurate budget allocations
  • Missed opportunities in reaching new customers
  • Prioritizing short-term activity over longer-lasting success

So let’s uncover the hidden dangers beneath ROAS’s shiny surface.

Exploring the Dangers of ROAS

Having acknowledged the seduction of ROAS, it’s time to consider its shortcomings. As Tom Roach astutely pointed out in Marketing Week, our fixation on digital metrics can lead us to dangerously undervalue the intangibles – the visibility, trust, and reputation that form the bedrock of lasting brand strength and profitability. In the pursuit of quick wins, we risk overlooking the very opportunities that could propel our businesses forward in the long run.

Measuring Beyond Clicks: The Inaccurate Attribution of ROAS

One of the biggest challenges with ROAS is the misrepresented value of post-impression clicks; in other words, ROAS fails to ascribe the contributions of offline influence. Print, outdoor, broadcast and other non-digital channels impact consumers in ways not reflected by clicks. Traditional ROAS models, strong in digital spaces, miss this crucial offline impact on purchasing decisions.

For example, consumers visit a business after seeing a billboard or picking up a magazine—interactions outside digital tracking. If this consumer later clicks on a paid AdWords campaign to make a purchase, the digital system logs this as a success, attributing a boosted ROAS to the online ad, while overlooking the impact of the offline engagement. This underscores the need for a holistic approach to measuring advertising effectiveness that integrates both online and offline consumer engagements.

Despite the challenges of measuring offline media, their influence in advancing the consumer’s journey remains undeniably powerful. Businesses need integrated measurement tools that factor in both digital metrics and the indirect influence of offline marketing. By adopting such comprehensive frameworks, businesses can better understand how various advertising channels contribute to sales, ensuring more equitable marketing budget allocation and clearer assessment of each channel’s true impact.

Algorithmic Bias and Campaign Effectiveness

While lauded for their effectiveness, digital advertising algorithms harbor an inherent bias towards existing customers. This bias creates a feedback loop where campaigns disproportionately target those already likely to convert; inflating ROAS metrics through conversions that might have happened anyway. This dynamic raises critical questions about the true return from ad spend and its impact on customer acquisition, as voiced by Marketing Week.

The challenge lies in reaching new customers at the top of the sales funnel. Current algorithms, programmed to favor known, lower-risk profiles, routinely overlook these potential customers. This inefficiency necessitates a more sophisticated understanding of digital advertising’s limitations. By recognizing these constraints and prioritizing the long-term benefits of brand building, businesses can refine targeting strategies and achieve genuine market growth. This approach ensures that advertising investments not only yield maximum legitimate and sustainable returns, but also foster lasting consumer relationships and brand loyalty, ultimately driving sales.

Challenges in Capturing Consumer Attention and Acquiring New Customers

Digital advertising presents a double-edged sword for customer acquisition. Algorithmic bias prioritizes existing customers, while fleeting attention spans make it difficult for ads to stand out in a constant barrage of messages (up to 10,000 daily as reported by Forbes). This fierce competition demands a strategic shift beyond mere digital exposure.

The solution lies in an integrated marketing approach. By combining the precision targeting of digital ads with the high-impact experiences of traditional media like print, broadcast, and outdoor advertising, businesses can create a more comprehensive engagement strategy. Traditional media offers tangible experiences that enhance brand visibility and recall, complementing the data-driven insights of digital channels. This multi-touchpoint approach, where creative campaigns interact with consumers across various channels, fosters a deeper connection and increases the likelihood of converting interest into action.

In essence, a multi-pronged advertising mix fuels businesses to navigate the crowded digital landscape. It not only attracts new customers but also deepens their involvement, ultimately driving sustainable customer relationships.

Enhancing ROAS with Traditional Media

While digital platforms dominate modern advertising, traditional media forms like print, outdoor, and broadcast still hold a significant edge in trust and engagement; offering a tangible counterpoint to digital ads. Integrating it into advertising strategies boosts engagement, complements digital efforts, and influences purchases across touchpoints.

The Complementary Benefits of Traditional Media

  • Enhanced Trust and Credibility: Traditional media, such as print ads, are highly trusted, with studies showing that 82% of consumers favor print ads for making purchasing decisions, according to Marketing Sherpa; they also require 21% less cognitive effort to process (C. Brayshaw & Company). This level of trust extends to other traditional formats, like broadcast and outdoor media, which are often seen as more reputable or less intrusive than digital ads.
  • Superior Engagement: Engagement with traditional media often surpasses that of digital formats. For example, print readers may spend over 20 minutes engaged with publications, significantly enhancing the likelihood of absorbing and acting on the advertising content (LocaliQ). This extended engagement is advantageous for creating lasting brand impressions.
  • Integrated Marketing Impact: Campaigns that blend traditional media with digital strategies can see up to a 400% increase in This statistic, from Top Media Advertising, highlights the powerful synergy that can be achieved when traditional and digital media are used together, leveraging the strengths of each to amplify a campaign’s impact.
  • Targeted Reach, Broad Coverage, Lasting Impression: Unlike fleeting digital ads, traditional media blankets high-traffic areas and lingers. Print publications, for example, can be revisited, shared, or displayed, extending reach and effectiveness. This physical presence strengthens brand recognition and recall, solidifying your position in consumers’ minds.

Marketing success has no shortcuts. It starts with business owners, marketing departments, and professionals recognizing the importance of an integrated strategy. Such a strategy deepens the consumer’s experience by offering multiple touchpoints, leading to more informed purchasing decisions. By embracing an integrated approach that includes both traditional and digital media, businesses can create more dynamic, effective advertising strategies that drive higher profitability and market share. This integrated approach not only captures the immediate advantages of digital targeting and analytics but also harnesses the enduring value and impact of traditional media.

David L. Miller is CEO of Davler Media, NYC’s largest independent tourism media platform. Davler’s approach to media is to create products that help consumers decide how to best spend their discretionary time and money.

Additional Resources

Marketing Week- Beware of ROAS, ROI’s dangerous digital twin (very comprehensive read) Harvard Business Review- 4 Factors Separating the Top Marketers From the Rest of the Pack Adweek-It’s Time to Rethink ROAS

Marketing Week- Is a focus on ROAS damaging marketing teams?

EasyInsights-Here’s why ROAS shouldn’t be the only focus of modern-day marketers Ad Age-Why relevance is the new personalization for marketers (Video interview)

LinkedIn Post – Why ROAS is the worst metric to measure campaign performance (A thoughtful read)